Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 06:47:48 -0700, Chaddy2222
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >Well considering that Hatter said that my site looked like "old Arse"
> >I would suggest that he would not be able to grasp the fact that his
> >sites need to actually be umm used by real people,
> Real people don't want to visit sites that look like old ass. Ask
> yourself this kiddo...how many corporate websites do you know of that
> look like your sites...yeah, none. Free cl00, there's a REASON for
> it. *nods*
> ...some kids can be a lil a slow, it's best to try and explain things
> to them by using examples...beating them senselessly with their own
> stupidity helps too sometimes. ^_^
> >mind you they seam
> >to have bugger-all content anyway and god knows why people would waste
> >good money on sites that look like that (art sites being the exception
> >to that rule obviously.
> Oh so then you think a PLAIN TEXT site would be superior to
Yes!. I do not have a problem with Flash being used for some things
and if you must know I use YouTube all the time and I think it's a
great example of what can be done with Flash.
Oh and if you must know I have done some sites with graphics myself
(actually a week or three ago I designed a photo gallery useing
notghing more then XHTML and CSS.
Regards Chad http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz